Ir al contenido
 Español      
HP.com Puerto Rico principal Productos y Servicios Soporte y Controladores Soluciones Cómo Comprar
» Contactar HP
     Búsqueda avanzada en foros
HP.com Puerto Rico principal
IT Resource Center Forums > Storage > HP LeftHand P4000

can I put 3 P4500 in site1 and 2 in site2

» 

Centro de Recursos de Tecnología Informática

» Inicio de sesión
» Registro
» Mi perfil
» Búsqueda en la base de conocimientos
» Foros
» Base de datos de parches
» Descargar controladores, software y firmware
» Comprobación de la garantía
» Administrador de casos de soporte
» Administrador de actualizaciones de software
» Capacitación y educación
» Más opciones de mantenimiento y soporte
» Ayuda online
» Mapa del sitio

Member icons
 
 HP moderator  HP moderator
 Expert in this area  Expert in this area
Member status
ITRC Pro ITRC Pro
250 points
ITRC Graduate ITRC Graduate
500 points
ITRC Wizard ITRC Wizard
1000 points
ITRC Royalty ITRC Royalty
2500 points
ITRC Pharaoh ITRC Pharaoh
7500 points
Olympian Olympian
20000 points
1-Star Olympian 1-Star Olympian
40000 points
2-Star Olympian 2-Star Olympian
80000 points
»  How to earn points
»  Support forums FAQs
Question status
Magical answer Magical answer
Message with a response that solved the author's question
Favorites status
Add to my favorites Add to my favorites
Delete from my favorites Delete from my favorites
This thread has been closed Thread closed
 

Aquí empieza el contenido
   Create a new message    Receive e-mail notification if a new reply is posted  Reply to this message
Author Subject: can I put 3 P4500 in site1 and 2 in site2      Add to my favorites
Nexis Support Engineer
Oct 19, 2009 16:06:40 GMT   

can you configure network raid 2 in site 1 over 3 boxes ??
can you mix the boxes of 8 and 12 disk in the same cluster,
can you mix different disk size boxes in the same cluster??

K
Note: If you are the author of this question and wish to assign points to any of the answers, please login first.For more information on assigning points ,click here


Sort Answers By: Date or Points
teledata Expert in this area
Oct 19, 2009 16:21:14 GMT  8 pts

2-way replication (network RAID) requires 2 or more nodes, so 3 boxes would work for this. You would have 2/3 total Cluster usable space assuming you did 2-way replication on all volumes in the cluster.

You technically CAN mix 8 and 12 disk units together, however you will only get the IOP performance as if you were running all 8 disk units. A cluster will always drop to the lowest common denominator.

Same rule from above applies with size: If you have a cluster that contains:
1 unit of 8x146GB (RAID 5)
1 unit of 8x300GB (RAID 5)
= 1022 x 2 = 2044GB.

Any larger nodes will actually display "some stranded space" indicating such.
HP moderator Gauche
Oct 29, 2009 19:56:53 GMT  8 pts

I agree with Teldata, especially about how space is consumed if you mix nodes of different sizes.
When it comes to performance though everything does not just drop to the lowest common denominator. Everything, on average, ends up somewhere in the middle actually. And you'll get inconsistent results in that which node you happened to get load balanced to will have some affect on what you actually see.
This means that clusters of dissimilar nodes yields somewhat unpredictable performance results.
The capacity utilization on the other hand is totally predictable.

SAN/iQ (P4000 SANs) allow you to mix clusters in any way you want. RAID types, nodes, size, disk type, anything. As long as they are running the same, or even close to the same, version SAN/iQ you can mix them. Mostly this is to allow for all the different combiniations of possible migration scenarios and there are some node types that make complete sense to mix.

One of the most common mixes are nodes that might be slightly different hardware, but still ran the same disk # and architecture. For example, mixing the DL320s nodes, the NSM 2120, the NSM 2120 G2, and the P4500 makes complete sense and is expected. They were/are all 12 drive nodes, just different generations.
teledata Expert in this area
Oct 29, 2009 20:40:16 GMT  8 pts

So my answer probably "should" have been:

Performance will be unpredictiblem, and CAN be as low as the poorest performing node in your cluster.. Depending on load balancing, gateway etc etc.
 
Create a new message    Receive e-mail notification if a new reply is posted   Reply to this message
 
 
Printable version
Declaración de confidencialidad El uso de este sitio implica la aceptación de sus políticas de uso
© 2009 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.